Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cambodia
29,738 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
91st
New Zealand rank
88th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cambodia
  • New Zealand
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k197720002023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,738 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 2,455 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 88th of 191 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 15,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 18,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 27,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,357 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 29,297 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cambodia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,738 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cambodia and New Zealand?
2,455 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cambodia ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/">Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.