Cape Verde vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cape Verde
21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
22,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
113th
East Timor rank
110th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • East Timor
010.0k20.0k30.0k198020012023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 22,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 113th and East Timor ranks 110th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 17,194 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 738.78 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 24,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,393 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 23,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cape Verde or East Timor?
East Timor, at 22,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cape Verde and East Timor?
568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and East Timor?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and East Timor rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cape Verde ranks 113th and East Timor ranks 110th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/timor-leste/">Cape Verde vs East Timor: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.