Cape Verde vs Senegal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cape Verde
21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
20,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
113th
Senegal rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Senegal
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Senegal, a difference of 571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Senegal ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 113th and Senegal ranks 115th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Senegal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Senegal Difference Ahead
1980s 5,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,269 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 8,704 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 589.38 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 17,194 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,463 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 24,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,484 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,401 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 23,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,045 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,205 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cape Verde or Senegal?
Cape Verde, at 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cape Verde and Senegal?
571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Senegal?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Senegal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cape Verde ranks 113th and Senegal ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Senegal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/senegal/">Cape Verde vs Senegal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.