Cape Verde vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cape Verde
21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
113th
Nicaragua rank
114th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Nicaragua
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 317 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 113th and Nicaragua ranks 114th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1980s 5,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,346 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 8,704 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75.4 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 17,194 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,611 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,583 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 24,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 23,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,887 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cape Verde or Nicaragua?
Cape Verde, at 21,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cape Verde and Nicaragua?
317 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Nicaragua?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Nicaragua rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cape Verde ranks 113th and Nicaragua ranks 114th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/nicaragua/">Cape Verde vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.