Burkina Faso vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Burkina Faso
11,414 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
10,084 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
146th
Papua New Guinea rank
149th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Papua New Guinea
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 11,414 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,084 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 149th of 191 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 7,671 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 761.62 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 9,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 11,004 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Burkina Faso or Papua New Guinea?
Burkina Faso, at 11,414 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,084 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea?
1,330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Burkina Faso ranks 146th and Papua New Guinea ranks 149th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/papua-new-guinea/">Burkina Faso vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.