Bulgaria vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Bulgaria
22,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bulgaria rank
111th
Nicaragua rank
114th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Nicaragua
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 22,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 807 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 114th of 191 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1980s 36,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,346 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,596 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
1990s 28,689 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,780 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,909 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2000s 24,856 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,611 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,245 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2010s 20,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2020s 24,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Bulgaria or Nicaragua?
Bulgaria, at 22,050 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Bulgaria and Nicaragua?
807 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Nicaragua?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Nicaragua rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Bulgaria ranks 111th and Nicaragua ranks 114th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bulgaria/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bulgaria/nicaragua/">Bulgaria vs Nicaragua: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.