Botswana vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Botswana
537.95 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
191st
Namibia rank
189th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 537.95 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 493.05 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.9 times Botswana's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 189th of 191 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 284.81 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 678.91 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 394.1 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 386.02 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 814.62 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 428.6 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 397.85 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 693.17 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 507.11 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,021 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 513.66 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 529.12 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 514.22 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 537.95 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Botswana and Namibia?
493.05 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Botswana ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.