Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Vanuatu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
19,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Vanuatu
19,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Vanuatu rank
121st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Vanuatu
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197920012023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 19,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Vanuatu, a difference of 315 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Vanuatu ranks 121st of 191 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 18,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,084 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,519 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 19,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 20,555 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,679 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Vanuatu?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 19,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Vanuatu as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu?
315 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vanuatu rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Vanuatu ranks 121st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Vanuatu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/vanuatu/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Vanuatu: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.