Bhutan vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Bhutan
8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
155th
South Africa rank
157th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Bhutan
  • South Africa
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 80 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was South Africa ahead.

Bhutan ranks 155th and South Africa ranks 157th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan South Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 2,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 3,811 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,029 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217.84 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 5,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,817 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 6,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,311 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 513.1 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 8,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,233 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88.41 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Bhutan or South Africa?
Bhutan, at 8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Bhutan and South Africa?
80 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and South Africa?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Bhutan ranks 155th and South Africa ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/south-africa/">Bhutan vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.