Belgium vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Belgium
104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
30th
Rwanda rank
29th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Belgium
  • Rwanda
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 2,475 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 81,139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,427 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 102,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,375 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 100,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102,466 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,968 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Belgium or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Belgium and Rwanda?
2,475 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Belgium ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/rwanda/">Belgium vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.