Belgium vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Belgium
104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean
16,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
30th
Latin America & Caribbean rank
29th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Belgium
  • Latin America & Caribbean
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196519942023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 88,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 6.3 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 30th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 29th of 191 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Latin America & Caribbean Difference Ahead
2000s 81,139 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 102,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,386 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 100,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,399 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Belgium or Latin America & Caribbean?
Belgium, at 104,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Belgium and Latin America & Caribbean?
88,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latin America & Caribbean?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Belgium ranks 30th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/latin-america-and-caribbean/">Belgium vs Latin America & Caribbean: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.