Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Belarus
19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
123rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
122nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 19 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 123rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 122nd of 191 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 10,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,523 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,118 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 12,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 17,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 19,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 880.55 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Belarus or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?
19 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 123rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 122nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/tanzania/">Belarus vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.