Belarus vs Georgia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Belarus
19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
19,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
123rd
Georgia rank
120th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 19,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.

Belarus ranks 123rd and Georgia ranks 120th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 13,640 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,647 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,006 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 17,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 154.78 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 19,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,447 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 19,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,432 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Belarus and Georgia?
423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 123rd and Georgia ranks 120th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.