Barbados vs IDA blend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Barbados
224,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
59,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
8th
IDA blend rank
7th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Barbados
  • IDA blend
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197519992023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 224,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 165,610 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 3.8 times IDA blend's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 8th and IDA blend ranks 7th of 191 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados IDA blend Difference Ahead
1980s 344,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,987 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 329,333 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 285,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 265,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 249,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,980 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 218,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 244,518 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,323 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 198,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 252,174 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,796 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 195,378 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Barbados or IDA blend?
Barbados, at 224,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Barbados and IDA blend?
165,610 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and IDA blend?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Barbados and IDA blend rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Barbados ranks 8th and IDA blend ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs IDA blend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/ida-blend/">Barbados vs IDA blend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.