Argentina vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Argentina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 7,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,578 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 990.57 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 1970s | 4,769 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,160 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 609.4 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 1980s | 5,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,813 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 757.47 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 1990s | 6,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 6,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 391.09 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2000s | 8,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,143 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2010s | 10,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 6,171 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2020s | 9,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 6,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Argentina or Zimbabwe?
- Argentina, at 7,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zimbabwe?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Argentina ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.