Argentina vs Bhutan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Argentina
7,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
158th
Bhutan rank
155th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Bhutan
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196519942023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 158th and Bhutan ranks 155th of 191 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Bhutan Difference Ahead
1980s 5,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 6,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,811 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 8,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,430 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 10,449 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,625 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 9,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,776 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Argentina or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 8,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Argentina and Bhutan?
275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bhutan?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Bhutan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Argentina ranks 158th and Bhutan ranks 155th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Bhutan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bhutan/">Argentina vs Bhutan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.