Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Antigua and Barbuda
69,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
67,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
47th
Ireland rank
50th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Ireland
020.0k40.0k60.0k197720002023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 69,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 67,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 1,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ireland ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 47th and Ireland ranks 50th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 37,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,212 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 40,159 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 50,065 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,934 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,131 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 61,058 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,950 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Antigua and Barbuda or Ireland?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 69,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 67,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland?
1,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ireland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 47th and Ireland ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/ireland/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.