Angola vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Angola
13,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
139th
Latvia rank
138th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Angola
  • Latvia
5.0k10.0k15.0k199520092023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 6,083 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,234 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,151 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 10,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 12,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Angola or Latvia?
Latvia, at 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Angola and Latvia?
458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Latvia?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Angola ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/latvia/">Angola vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.