Paraguay vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Paraguay
586.06 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Asia
346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Paraguay rank
33rd
South Asia rank
35th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Paraguay
  • South Asia
100200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 586.06 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia, a difference of 239.13 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.7 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was South Asia ahead.

Paraguay ranks 33rd and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 5 and South Asia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay South Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 145.24 constant 2015 US$ per person 173.32 constant 2015 US$ per person 28.09 constant 2015 US$ per person South Asia
1970s 172.59 constant 2015 US$ per person 173.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per person South Asia
1980s 226.09 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.47 constant 2015 US$ per person 50.62 constant 2015 US$ per person Paraguay
1990s 275.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 193.03 constant 2015 US$ per person 82.93 constant 2015 US$ per person Paraguay
2000s 341.6 constant 2015 US$ per person 209.15 constant 2015 US$ per person 132.45 constant 2015 US$ per person Paraguay
2010s 541.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 257.02 constant 2015 US$ per person 284.84 constant 2015 US$ per person Paraguay
2020s 538.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 325.88 constant 2015 US$ per person 212.42 constant 2015 US$ per person Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Paraguay or South Asia?
Paraguay, at 586.06 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Paraguay and South Asia?
239.13 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and South Asia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
How do Paraguay and South Asia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Paraguay ranks 33rd and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/paraguay/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/paraguay/south-asia/">Paraguay vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.