Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Pakistan
364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Sierra Leone
365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Pakistan rank
91st
Sierra Leone rank
89th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sierra Leone
0100200300400196019922025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person against 364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pakistan, a difference of 1.37 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 91st and Sierra Leone ranks 89th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 242.2 constant 2015 US$ per person 172.15 constant 2015 US$ per person 70.05 constant 2015 US$ per person Pakistan
1970s 258.52 constant 2015 US$ per person 182.16 constant 2015 US$ per person 76.36 constant 2015 US$ per person Pakistan
1980s 257.49 constant 2015 US$ per person 259.08 constant 2015 US$ per person 1.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Sierra Leone
1990s 286.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 294.38 constant 2015 US$ per person 7.97 constant 2015 US$ per person Sierra Leone
2000s 308.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 289.76 constant 2015 US$ per person 19.21 constant 2015 US$ per person Pakistan
2010s 317.87 constant 2015 US$ per person 333.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 16.08 constant 2015 US$ per person Sierra Leone
2020s 348.51 constant 2015 US$ per person 356.69 constant 2015 US$ per person 8.17 constant 2015 US$ per person Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Pakistan or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person against 364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
1.37 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sierra Leone?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Sierra Leone rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Pakistan ranks 91st and Sierra Leone ranks 89th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/pakistan/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/pakistan/sierra-leone/">Pakistan vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.