Nicaragua vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nicaragua
366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Sierra Leone
365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
88th
Sierra Leone rank
89th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Sierra Leone
0100200300400500196019922025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person against 365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.79 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 88th and Sierra Leone ranks 89th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 427.74 constant 2015 US$ per person 172.15 constant 2015 US$ per person 255.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1970s 422.81 constant 2015 US$ per person 182.16 constant 2015 US$ per person 240.65 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1980s 276.93 constant 2015 US$ per person 259.08 constant 2015 US$ per person 17.84 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1990s 229.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 294.38 constant 2015 US$ per person 64.67 constant 2015 US$ per person Sierra Leone
2000s 306.84 constant 2015 US$ per person 289.76 constant 2015 US$ per person 17.08 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
2010s 353.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 333.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 19.45 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
2020s 378.73 constant 2015 US$ per person 356.69 constant 2015 US$ per person 22.04 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Nicaragua or Sierra Leone?
Nicaragua, at 366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person against 365.61 constant 2015 US$ per person in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nicaragua and Sierra Leone?
0.79 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sierra Leone?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Nicaragua and Sierra Leone rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nicaragua ranks 88th and Sierra Leone ranks 89th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/nicaragua/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/nicaragua/sierra-leone/">Nicaragua vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.