Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nicaragua
366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Pakistan
364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
88th
Pakistan rank
91st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Pakistan
0100200300400500196019922025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person against 364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pakistan, a difference of 2.16 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 388.39 constant 2015 US$ per person 235.28 constant 2015 US$ per person 153.11 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1970s 422.81 constant 2015 US$ per person 258.52 constant 2015 US$ per person 164.29 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1980s 276.93 constant 2015 US$ per person 257.49 constant 2015 US$ per person 19.43 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
1990s 229.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 286.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 56.7 constant 2015 US$ per person Pakistan
2000s 306.84 constant 2015 US$ per person 308.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 2.12 constant 2015 US$ per person Pakistan
2010s 353.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 317.87 constant 2015 US$ per person 35.53 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua
2020s 378.73 constant 2015 US$ per person 348.51 constant 2015 US$ per person 30.22 constant 2015 US$ per person Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Nicaragua or Pakistan?
Nicaragua, at 366.4 constant 2015 US$ per person against 364.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nicaragua and Pakistan?
2.16 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Pakistan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Nicaragua and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nicaragua ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/nicaragua/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/nicaragua/pakistan/">Nicaragua vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.