Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 586.06 constant 2015 US$ per person against 360.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 225.82 constant 2015 US$ per person.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.6 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Paraguay ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Paraguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 249.04 constant 2015 US$ per person | 145.24 constant 2015 US$ per person | 103.8 constant 2015 US$ per person | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 265.35 constant 2015 US$ per person | 172.59 constant 2015 US$ per person | 92.76 constant 2015 US$ per person | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 273.61 constant 2015 US$ per person | 226.09 constant 2015 US$ per person | 47.52 constant 2015 US$ per person | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 303.55 constant 2015 US$ per person | 275.96 constant 2015 US$ per person | 27.59 constant 2015 US$ per person | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 321.68 constant 2015 US$ per person | 341.6 constant 2015 US$ per person | 19.93 constant 2015 US$ per person | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 341.89 constant 2015 US$ per person | 541.86 constant 2015 US$ per person | 199.97 constant 2015 US$ per person | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 358.09 constant 2015 US$ per person | 538.3 constant 2015 US$ per person | 180.21 constant 2015 US$ per person | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 586.06 constant 2015 US$ per person against 360.24 constant 2015 US$ per person in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Paraguay?
- 225.82 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Paraguay?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Paraguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Paraguay ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.