Low & middle income vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Low & middle income
508.01 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Malaysia
752.15 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Low & middle income rank
18th
Malaysia rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Malaysia
200400600800196019922025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 752.15 constant 2015 US$ per person against 508.01 constant 2015 US$ per person in Low & middle income, a difference of 244.14 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.5 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 20th of 46 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Malaysia Difference Ahead
1970s 227.24 constant 2015 US$ per person 778.46 constant 2015 US$ per person 551.22 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia
1980s 249.84 constant 2015 US$ per person 860.92 constant 2015 US$ per person 611.08 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia
1990s 281.62 constant 2015 US$ per person 776.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 495.01 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia
2000s 327.06 constant 2015 US$ per person 736.78 constant 2015 US$ per person 409.72 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia
2010s 405.94 constant 2015 US$ per person 786.46 constant 2015 US$ per person 380.52 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia
2020s 480.16 constant 2015 US$ per person 742.54 constant 2015 US$ per person 262.37 constant 2015 US$ per person Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Low & middle income or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 752.15 constant 2015 US$ per person against 508.01 constant 2015 US$ per person in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Low & middle income and Malaysia?
244.14 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Malaysia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Low & middle income and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Low & middle income ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 20th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/malaysia/">Low & middle income vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.