Jamaica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Jamaica
397.73 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Tunisia
377.09 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Jamaica rank
84th
Tunisia rank
86th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Tunisia
100200300400196519952025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 397.73 constant 2015 US$ per person against 377.09 constant 2015 US$ per person in Tunisia, a difference of 20.64 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 86th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 324.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 138.66 constant 2015 US$ per person 185.97 constant 2015 US$ per person Jamaica
1970s 370.45 constant 2015 US$ per person 197.32 constant 2015 US$ per person 173.13 constant 2015 US$ per person Jamaica
1980s 304.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 200.29 constant 2015 US$ per person 104.37 constant 2015 US$ per person Jamaica
1990s 367.05 constant 2015 US$ per person 248.83 constant 2015 US$ per person 118.23 constant 2015 US$ per person Jamaica
2000s 283.59 constant 2015 US$ per person 289.53 constant 2015 US$ per person 5.94 constant 2015 US$ per person Tunisia
2010s 324.56 constant 2015 US$ per person 345.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 21.07 constant 2015 US$ per person Tunisia
2020s 381.12 constant 2015 US$ per person 363.78 constant 2015 US$ per person 17.35 constant 2015 US$ per person Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Jamaica or Tunisia?
Jamaica, at 397.73 constant 2015 US$ per person against 377.09 constant 2015 US$ per person in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Jamaica and Tunisia?
20.64 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tunisia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Tunisia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Jamaica ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 86th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/jamaica/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/jamaica/tunisia/">Jamaica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.