Indonesia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Indonesia
535.27 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Asia
346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Indonesia rank
37th
South Asia rank
35th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Indonesia
  • South Asia
200300400500196019922025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 535.27 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia, a difference of 188.34 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.5 times South Asia's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 37th and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia South Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 232.34 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.52 constant 2015 US$ per person 56.82 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
1970s 243.6 constant 2015 US$ per person 173.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 69.89 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
1980s 278.35 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.47 constant 2015 US$ per person 102.89 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
1990s 309.7 constant 2015 US$ per person 193.03 constant 2015 US$ per person 116.67 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
2000s 341.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 209.15 constant 2015 US$ per person 132.66 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
2010s 437.7 constant 2015 US$ per person 257.02 constant 2015 US$ per person 180.68 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia
2020s 511.9 constant 2015 US$ per person 325.88 constant 2015 US$ per person 186.02 constant 2015 US$ per person Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Indonesia or South Asia?
Indonesia, at 535.27 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Indonesia and South Asia?
188.34 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Asia?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and South Asia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Indonesia ranks 37th and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/indonesia/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/indonesia/south-asia/">Indonesia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.