Iceland vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Iceland
2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
New Zealand
1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Iceland rank
2nd
New Zealand rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Iceland
  • New Zealand
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197720012025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person in New Zealand, a difference of 866 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times New Zealand's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 194 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 3,635 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,623 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,011 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2000s 3,180 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,652 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,528 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2010s 2,830 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,645 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,185 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2020s 2,943 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,631 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,312 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Iceland or New Zealand?
Iceland, at 2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Iceland and New Zealand?
866 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Zealand?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Iceland and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Iceland ranks 2nd and New Zealand ranks 4th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/iceland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/iceland/new-zealand/">Iceland vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.