Hong Kong, China vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Hong Kong, China
21.1 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Zambia
57.08 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
191st
Zambia rank
189th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Zambia
050100150196519952025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 57.08 constant 2015 US$ per person against 21.1 constant 2015 US$ per person in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 35.98 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Zambia's figure about 2.7 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 191st and Zambia ranks 189th of 194 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 43.53 constant 2015 US$ per person 105.11 constant 2015 US$ per person 61.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Zambia
2010s 29.8 constant 2015 US$ per person 68.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 38.87 constant 2015 US$ per person Zambia
2020s 23.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 54.19 constant 2015 US$ per person 30.89 constant 2015 US$ per person Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Hong Kong, China or Zambia?
Zambia, at 57.08 constant 2015 US$ per person against 21.1 constant 2015 US$ per person in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
35.98 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 191st and Zambia ranks 189th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/zambia/">Hong Kong, China vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.