Gambia vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Gambia
163.41 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Africa
163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Gambia rank
168th
South Africa rank
169th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Gambia
  • South Africa
100150200250300196019922025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 163.41 constant 2015 US$ per person against 163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Africa, a difference of 0.13 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 168th and South Africa ranks 169th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 256.89 constant 2015 US$ per person 146.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 110.25 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
1970s 284.84 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 148.21 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
1980s 257.12 constant 2015 US$ per person 125.57 constant 2015 US$ per person 131.55 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
1990s 177.08 constant 2015 US$ per person 111.11 constant 2015 US$ per person 65.98 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
2000s 193.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 118.38 constant 2015 US$ per person 75.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
2010s 150.59 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 13.92 constant 2015 US$ per person Gambia
2020s 153.33 constant 2015 US$ per person 158.2 constant 2015 US$ per person 4.87 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Gambia or South Africa?
Gambia, at 163.41 constant 2015 US$ per person against 163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Gambia and South Africa?
0.13 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and South Africa?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Gambia and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Gambia ranks 168th and South Africa ranks 169th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/gambia-the/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/gambia-the/south-africa/">Gambia vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.