Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Eswatini
199.93 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
192.19 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Eswatini rank
159th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
162nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
100200300400197119982025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 199.93 constant 2015 US$ per person against 192.19 constant 2015 US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 7.74 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 159th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 289.57 constant 2015 US$ per person 220.66 constant 2015 US$ per person 68.91 constant 2015 US$ per person Eswatini
1980s 257.83 constant 2015 US$ per person 213.89 constant 2015 US$ per person 43.94 constant 2015 US$ per person Eswatini
1990s 201.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 217.75 constant 2015 US$ per person 16.12 constant 2015 US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 221.4 constant 2015 US$ per person 179.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 42.1 constant 2015 US$ per person Eswatini
2010s 247.22 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.04 constant 2015 US$ per person 72.18 constant 2015 US$ per person Eswatini
2020s 218.17 constant 2015 US$ per person 185.61 constant 2015 US$ per person 32.57 constant 2015 US$ per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Eswatini, at 199.93 constant 2015 US$ per person against 192.19 constant 2015 US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
7.74 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Eswatini ranks 159th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.