Ecuador vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Asia
346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
32nd
South Asia rank
35th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Asia
200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia, a difference of 239.19 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times South Asia's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 32nd and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 286.18 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.52 constant 2015 US$ per person 110.66 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
1970s 249.68 constant 2015 US$ per person 173.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 75.97 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
1980s 226.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.47 constant 2015 US$ per person 50.84 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
1990s 296.55 constant 2015 US$ per person 193.03 constant 2015 US$ per person 103.52 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
2000s 353.24 constant 2015 US$ per person 209.15 constant 2015 US$ per person 144.09 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
2010s 458.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 257.02 constant 2015 US$ per person 201.8 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador
2020s 541.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 325.88 constant 2015 US$ per person 215.94 constant 2015 US$ per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or South Asia?
Ecuador, at 586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person against 346.93 constant 2015 US$ per person in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and South Asia?
239.19 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Asia?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and South Asia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 32nd and South Asia ranks 35th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/ecuador/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/ecuador/south-asia/">Ecuador vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.