Costa Rica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Costa Rica
568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
287.43 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
35th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
38th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person against 287.43 constant 2015 US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 281.55 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 2.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th of 194 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 388.75 constant 2015 US$ per person 190.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 198.45 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1990s 471.06 constant 2015 US$ per person 192.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 278.42 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2000s 536.72 constant 2015 US$ per person 230.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 306.47 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2010s 578.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 266.68 constant 2015 US$ per person 312.18 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2020s 578.5 constant 2015 US$ per person 281.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 297.25 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Costa Rica or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Costa Rica, at 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person against 287.43 constant 2015 US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Costa Rica and Sub-Saharan Africa?
281.55 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sub-Saharan Africa?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Costa Rica ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/costa-rica/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/costa-rica/sub-saharan-africa/">Costa Rica vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.