Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Costa Rica
568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Ecuador
586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
35th
Ecuador rank
32nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person against 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 17.14 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 194 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 333.35 constant 2015 US$ per person 286.18 constant 2015 US$ per person 47.18 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1970s 408.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 249.68 constant 2015 US$ per person 159.04 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1980s 389.26 constant 2015 US$ per person 226.3 constant 2015 US$ per person 162.95 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1990s 471.06 constant 2015 US$ per person 296.55 constant 2015 US$ per person 174.51 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2000s 536.72 constant 2015 US$ per person 353.24 constant 2015 US$ per person 183.48 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2010s 578.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 458.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 120.03 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2020s 578.5 constant 2015 US$ per person 541.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 36.68 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 586.12 constant 2015 US$ per person against 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
17.14 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Costa Rica ranks 35th and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/costa-rica/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/costa-rica/ecuador/">Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.