Congo vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Congo
150.85 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
South Africa
163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Congo rank
172nd
South Africa rank
169th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
050100150200196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person against 150.85 constant 2015 US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 12.43 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 172nd and South Africa ranks 169th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 158.79 constant 2015 US$ per person 142.8 constant 2015 US$ per person 15.99 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
1970s 155.61 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.63 constant 2015 US$ per person 18.99 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
1980s 168.47 constant 2015 US$ per person 125.57 constant 2015 US$ per person 42.9 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
1990s 141.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 111.11 constant 2015 US$ per person 30.31 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
2000s 131.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 118.38 constant 2015 US$ per person 13.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
2010s 142.5 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 5.83 constant 2015 US$ per person Congo
2020s 147.17 constant 2015 US$ per person 158.2 constant 2015 US$ per person 11.03 constant 2015 US$ per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Congo or South Africa?
South Africa, at 163.28 constant 2015 US$ per person against 150.85 constant 2015 US$ per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Congo and South Africa?
12.43 constant 2015 US$ per person, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Congo ranks 172nd and South Africa ranks 169th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.