China vs Middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

China
974.53 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Middle income
549.02 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
China rank
10th
Middle income rank
9th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • China
  • Middle income
2004006008001.0k196019922025

How they compare

China currently reports 974.53 constant 2015 US$ per person against 549.02 constant 2015 US$ per person in Middle income, a difference of 425.51 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.8 times Middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Middle income ahead.

China ranks 10th and Middle income ranks 9th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Middle income in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 181.92 constant 2015 US$ per person 213.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 31.94 constant 2015 US$ per person Middle income
1970s 203.8 constant 2015 US$ per person 229.5 constant 2015 US$ per person 25.7 constant 2015 US$ per person Middle income
1980s 257.83 constant 2015 US$ per person 253.82 constant 2015 US$ per person 4.02 constant 2015 US$ per person China
1990s 353.58 constant 2015 US$ per person 288.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 65.33 constant 2015 US$ per person China
2000s 465.98 constant 2015 US$ per person 339.39 constant 2015 US$ per person 126.59 constant 2015 US$ per person China
2010s 661.28 constant 2015 US$ per person 429.18 constant 2015 US$ per person 232.11 constant 2015 US$ per person China
2020s 880.9 constant 2015 US$ per person 516.39 constant 2015 US$ per person 364.51 constant 2015 US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Middle income?
China, at 974.53 constant 2015 US$ per person against 549.02 constant 2015 US$ per person in Middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Middle income?
425.51 constant 2015 US$ per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Middle income?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Middle income rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
China ranks 10th and Middle income ranks 9th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/china/middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/china/middle-income/">China vs Middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.