Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Central African Republic
127.91 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
175th
Equatorial Guinea rank
174th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Equatorial Guinea
50100150200200620152025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person against 127.91 constant 2015 US$ per person in Central African Republic, a difference of 11.81 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 197.14 constant 2015 US$ per person 118.69 constant 2015 US$ per person 78.46 constant 2015 US$ per person Central African Republic
2010s 129.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 153.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 24.71 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 120.12 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.45 constant 2015 US$ per person 16.33 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person against 127.91 constant 2015 US$ per person in Central African Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
11.81 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.