Botswana vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Botswana
121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Malawi
114.45 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Botswana rank
177th
Malawi rank
180th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Malawi
50100150200250300196019922025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person against 114.45 constant 2015 US$ per person in Malawi, a difference of 6.6 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 177th and Malawi ranks 180th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 141.27 constant 2015 US$ per person 98.72 constant 2015 US$ per person 42.55 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana
1970s 229.27 constant 2015 US$ per person 108.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 121.02 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana
1980s 147.03 constant 2015 US$ per person 92.36 constant 2015 US$ per person 54.67 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana
1990s 148.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 97.76 constant 2015 US$ per person 50.91 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana
2000s 122.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 123.93 constant 2015 US$ per person 1.06 constant 2015 US$ per person Malawi
2010s 131.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 123.27 constant 2015 US$ per person 8.37 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana
2020s 122.95 constant 2015 US$ per person 119.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 3.31 constant 2015 US$ per person Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Botswana or Malawi?
Botswana, at 121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person against 114.45 constant 2015 US$ per person in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Botswana and Malawi?
6.6 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malawi?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Malawi rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Botswana ranks 177th and Malawi ranks 180th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/botswana/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/botswana/malawi/">Botswana vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.