Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Botswana
121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Botswana rank
177th
Equatorial Guinea rank
174th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
100150200250300196019922025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person against 121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person in Botswana, a difference of 18.67 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Botswana ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 194 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 134.58 constant 2015 US$ per person 153.11 constant 2015 US$ per person 18.53 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 131.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 153.96 constant 2015 US$ per person 22.32 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 122.95 constant 2015 US$ per person 136.45 constant 2015 US$ per person 13.5 constant 2015 US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 139.72 constant 2015 US$ per person against 121.05 constant 2015 US$ per person in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
18.67 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Botswana ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.