How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Chile?

56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belize vs Chile: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Belize

598.71 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Chile

588.15 constant 2015 US$ per person

in 2025

Belize rank

28th

Chile rank

31st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

Belize
Chile

How they compare

Belize currently reports 598.71 constant 2015 US$ per person against 588.15 constant 2015 US$ per person in Chile, a difference of 10.56 constant 2015 US$ per person.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 28th and Chile ranks 31st of 194 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belize	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1970s	340.09 constant 2015 US$ per person	119.3 constant 2015 US$ per person	220.8 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize
1980s	379.38 constant 2015 US$ per person	149.48 constant 2015 US$ per person	229.9 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize
1990s	500.3 constant 2015 US$ per person	241.43 constant 2015 US$ per person	258.87 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize
2000s	670.89 constant 2015 US$ per person	367.86 constant 2015 US$ per person	303.03 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize
2010s	587.81 constant 2015 US$ per person	503.06 constant 2015 US$ per person	84.75 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize
2020s	568.58 constant 2015 US$ per person	529.22 constant 2015 US$ per person	39.37 constant 2015 US$ per person	Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Belize or Chile?: Belize, at 598.71 constant 2015 US$ per person against 588.15 constant 2015 US$ per person in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Belize and Chile?: 10.56 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Chile?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Belize and Chile rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?: Belize ranks 28th and Chile ranks 31st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Chile: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/belize/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/belize/chile/">Belize vs Chile: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.