Australia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Australia
1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
New Zealand
1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Australia rank
5th
New Zealand rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Australia
  • New Zealand
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197520002025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person in Australia, a difference of 231 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 1,024 constant 2015 US$ per person 993.58 constant 2015 US$ per person 30.44 constant 2015 US$ per person Australia
1980s 946.36 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,282 constant 2015 US$ per person 335.15 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
1990s 1,063 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,544 constant 2015 US$ per person 481.73 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2000s 1,295 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,652 constant 2015 US$ per person 356.99 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2010s 1,320 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,645 constant 2015 US$ per person 324.8 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2020s 1,281 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,631 constant 2015 US$ per person 349.62 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Australia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1,678 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Australia and New Zealand?
231 constant 2015 US$ per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
48 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Australia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/australia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/australia/new-zealand/">Australia vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.