Australia vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Australia
1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Iceland
2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Australia rank
5th
Iceland rank
2nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197520002025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person in Australia, a difference of 1,097 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.8 times Australia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 5th and Iceland ranks 2nd of 194 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 1,099 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,635 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,536 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2000s 1,295 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,180 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,885 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2010s 1,320 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,830 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,509 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland
2020s 1,309 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,876 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,567 constant 2015 US$ per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Australia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 2,544 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,447 constant 2015 US$ per person in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Australia and Iceland?
1,097 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Australia ranks 5th and Iceland ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.