Argentina vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Argentina
651.33 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics
417.64 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Argentina rank
25th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0200400600800196519952025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 651.33 constant 2015 US$ per person against 417.64 constant 2015 US$ per person in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 233.69 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 25th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 26th of 194 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 564.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 345.42 constant 2015 US$ per person 219.3 constant 2015 US$ per person Argentina
2000s 615.95 constant 2015 US$ per person 350.51 constant 2015 US$ per person 265.44 constant 2015 US$ per person Argentina
2010s 661.94 constant 2015 US$ per person 371.81 constant 2015 US$ per person 290.13 constant 2015 US$ per person Argentina
2020s 611.25 constant 2015 US$ per person 405.56 constant 2015 US$ per person 205.7 constant 2015 US$ per person Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Argentina or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Argentina, at 651.33 constant 2015 US$ per person against 417.64 constant 2015 US$ per person in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Argentina and Central Europe and the Baltics?
233.69 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Central Europe and the Baltics?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Argentina ranks 25th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/argentina/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/argentina/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Argentina vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.