Arab World vs Costa Rica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Arab World
351.92 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Costa Rica
568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Arab World rank
34th
Costa Rica rank
35th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Arab World
  • Costa Rica
0200400600196019922025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person against 351.92 constant 2015 US$ per person in Arab World, a difference of 217.06 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.6 times Arab World's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Arab World ranks 34th and Costa Rica ranks 35th of 46 groups.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab World Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 314.68 constant 2015 US$ per person 377.81 constant 2015 US$ per person 63.13 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1970s 316.84 constant 2015 US$ per person 408.71 constant 2015 US$ per person 91.87 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1980s 313.66 constant 2015 US$ per person 389.26 constant 2015 US$ per person 75.59 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
1990s 348.41 constant 2015 US$ per person 471.06 constant 2015 US$ per person 122.65 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2000s 355.89 constant 2015 US$ per person 536.72 constant 2015 US$ per person 180.83 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2010s 359.31 constant 2015 US$ per person 578.86 constant 2015 US$ per person 219.54 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica
2020s 354.67 constant 2015 US$ per person 578.5 constant 2015 US$ per person 223.83 constant 2015 US$ per person Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Arab World or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 568.98 constant 2015 US$ per person against 351.92 constant 2015 US$ per person in Arab World as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Arab World and Costa Rica?
217.06 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Costa Rica?
58 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
How do Arab World and Costa Rica rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Arab World ranks 34th and Costa Rica ranks 35th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab World vs Costa Rica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/arab-world/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/arab-world/costa-rica/">Arab World vs Costa Rica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.