Antigua and Barbuda vs Jordan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Antigua and Barbuda
238.11 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Jordan
240.82 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
142nd
Jordan rank
141st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Jordan
100150200250300350197620002025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 240.82 constant 2015 US$ per person against 238.11 constant 2015 US$ per person in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 2.71 constant 2015 US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 142nd and Jordan ranks 141st of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 4 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 219.09 constant 2015 US$ per person 235.54 constant 2015 US$ per person 16.44 constant 2015 US$ per person Jordan
1980s 207.69 constant 2015 US$ per person 211.46 constant 2015 US$ per person 3.77 constant 2015 US$ per person Jordan
1990s 244.49 constant 2015 US$ per person 175.49 constant 2015 US$ per person 69 constant 2015 US$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 222.64 constant 2015 US$ per person 158.7 constant 2015 US$ per person 63.93 constant 2015 US$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 247.92 constant 2015 US$ per person 211.61 constant 2015 US$ per person 36.31 constant 2015 US$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 274.12 constant 2015 US$ per person 210.9 constant 2015 US$ per person 63.21 constant 2015 US$ per person Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Antigua and Barbuda or Jordan?
Jordan, at 240.82 constant 2015 US$ per person against 238.11 constant 2015 US$ per person in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Antigua and Barbuda and Jordan?
2.71 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Jordan?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Jordan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 142nd and Jordan ranks 141st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Jordan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/jordan/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Jordan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.