South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

South Sudan
21.6 % change on previous year
in 2015
Zimbabwe
25.87 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Sudan rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
-50-250255075197019972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.87 % change on previous year against 21.6 % change on previous year in South Sudan, a difference of 4.27 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 194 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 39.33 % change on previous year 14.8 % change on previous year 24.53 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s 6.66 % change on previous year 5.28 % change on previous year 1.38 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.87 % change on previous year against 21.6 % change on previous year in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
4.27 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
South Sudan ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,404 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.