Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Low income
5.07 % change on previous year
in 2025
Zimbabwe
25.87 % change on previous year
in 2025
Low income rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Low income
  • Zimbabwe
-40-20020197019972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.87 % change on previous year against 5.07 % change on previous year in Low income, a difference of 20.8 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.1 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Low income ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 3.96 % change on previous year 3.59 % change on previous year 0.3709 % change on previous year Low income
1990s 2.76 % change on previous year 4.94 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 2.39 % change on previous year -7.25 % change on previous year 9.64 % change on previous year Low income
2010s 2.26 % change on previous year 5.2 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 2.71 % change on previous year 6.97 % change on previous year 4.26 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Low income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.87 % change on previous year against 5.07 % change on previous year in Low income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Low income and Zimbabwe?
20.8 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Zimbabwe?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Low income ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/low-income/zimbabwe/">Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,404 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.