Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
5.25 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Sudan
21.6 % change on previous year
in 2015
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
5th
South Sudan rank
7th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • South Sudan
-250255075198920072025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 21.6 % change on previous year against 5.25 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 16.35 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Sudan ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 46 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 4 % change on previous year 39.33 % change on previous year 35.33 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s 3.06 % change on previous year 6.66 % change on previous year 3.6 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 21.6 % change on previous year against 5.25 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2015.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan?
16.35 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/south-sudan/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,404 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.