North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

North Macedonia
1.8%
in 2025
Uruguay
1.8%
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
114th
Uruguay rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Uruguay
-20-1001020198420042025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 114th and Uruguay ranks 115th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 1.6% 4.0% 2.4% Uruguay
2000s 3.4% 1.3% 2.1% North Macedonia
2010s -1.9% 1.2% 3.1% Uruguay
2020s -4.1% 2.8% 6.9% Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
North Macedonia, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
0.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
North Macedonia ranks 114th and Uruguay ranks 115th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/north-macedonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/north-macedonia/uruguay/">North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.