Maldives vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time
- Maldives
- South Sudan
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 22.6% against 21.6% in South Sudan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Sudan ahead.
Maldives ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 197 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.3% | 39.3% | 41.7% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 6.7% | 6.3% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Maldives or South Sudan?
- Maldives, at 22.6% against 21.6% in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Maldives and South Sudan?
- 1.0%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Maldives and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- Maldives ranks 6th and South Sudan ranks 7th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.