Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Low income
5.1%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
25.9%
in 2025
Low income rank
7th
Zimbabwe rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Low income
  • Zimbabwe
-40-20020197019972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.9% against 5.1% in Low income, a difference of 20.8%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.1 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Low income ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 4.0% 3.6% 0.4% Low income
1990s 2.8% 4.9% 2.2% Zimbabwe
2000s 2.4% -7.2% 9.6% Low income
2010s 2.3% 5.2% 2.9% Zimbabwe
2020s 2.7% 7.0% 4.3% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Low income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.9% against 5.1% in Low income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Low income and Zimbabwe?
20.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Zimbabwe?
41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
How do Low income and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Low income ranks 7th and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/low-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-annual-percent-growth/low-income/zimbabwe/">Low income vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)
Unit
annual % growth
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
244 places, 10,541 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.